Johannes T. Doerflinger

ORCID: 0000-0002-0228-7725
Publications
Citations
Views
---
Saved
---
About
Contact & Profiles
Research Areas
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Ethics in Business and Education
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Historical and Cultural Studies of Poland
  • Social Power and Status Dynamics
  • Ethics in medical practice
  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics
  • Resilience and Mental Health
  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Career Development and Diversity
  • Biotechnology and Related Fields
  • Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Central European Literary Studies

University of Konstanz
2016-2025

University of Freiburg
2025

German Cancer Research Center
2020

Heidelberg University
2020

Christoph Huber Anna Dreber Jürgen Huber Magnus Johannesson Michael Kirchler and 90 more Utz Weitzel Miguel Abellán Xeniya Adayeva Fehime Ceren Ay Kai Barron Zachariah Berry Werner Bönte Katharina Brütt Muhammed Bulutay Pol Campos‐Mercade Eric Cardella Maria Almudena Claassen Gert Cornelissen Ian Dawson Joyce Delnoij Elif E. Demiral Eugen Dimant Johannes T. Doerflinger Malte Dold Cécile Emery Lenka Fiala Susann Fiedler Eleonora Freddi Tilman Fries Agata Gąsiorowska Ulrich Glogowsky Paul M. Gorny Jeremy D. Gretton Antonia Grohmann Sebastian Hafenbrädl Michel J. J. Handgraaf Yaniv Hanoch Einav Hart Max Hennig Stanton Hudja Mandy Hütter Kyle Hyndman Konstantinos Ioannidis Ozan İşler Sabrina Jeworrek Daniel Jolles Marie Juanchich Raghabendra P. KC Menusch Khadjavi Tamar Kugler Shuwen Li Brian J. Lucas Vincent Mak Mario Mechtel Christoph Merkle Ethan A. Meyers Johanna Möllerström Alexander Nesterov Levent Neyse Petra Nieken Anne‐Marie Nussberger Helena Palumbo Kim Peters Angelo Pirrone Xiangdong Qin Rima-Maria Rahal Holger A. Rau Johannes Rincke Piero Ronzani Yefim Roth Ali Seyhun Saral Jan Schmitz Florian Schneider Arthur Schram Simeon Schudy Maurice E. Schweitzer Christiane Schwieren Irene Scopelliti Miroslav Sirota Joep Sonnemans Ivan Soraperra Lisa Spantig Ivo Steimanis Janina Steinmetz Sigrid Suetens Andriana Theodoropoulou Diemo Urbig Tobias Vorlaufer Joschka Waibel Daniel Woods Ofir Yakobi Onurcan Yılmaz Tomasz Zaleśkiewicz Stefan Zeisberger Felix Holzmeister

Does competition affect moral behavior? This fundamental question has been debated among leading scholars for centuries, and more recently, it tested in experimental studies yielding a body of rather inconclusive empirical evidence. A potential source ambivalent results on the same hypothesis is design heterogeneity-variation true effect sizes across various reasonable research protocols. To provide further evidence whether affects behavior to examine generalizability single study...

10.1073/pnas.2215572120 article EN cc-by Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2023-05-30

ABSTRACT Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) juggle between their feminine professional identity goals. The present research views these struggles from the perspective of goal pursuits. STEM may use different, sometimes even symbolic, ways to strive for two goals, example, by wearing outfits that reflect femininity, profession, or both. In studies, we tested what extent goals overlap (are seen as similar) whether higher is related preference serve at same time...

10.1111/sjop.13093 article EN Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 2025-02-02

Abstract In two studies, emotion emphasis effects on moral judgment are demonstrated. The studies indicate that emphasizing negative consequences in trolley-type dilemmas with emotional language produces more utilitarian responses if such is the of deontological option, and it option. This effect was moderated by action-phase related mindsets. Individuals an implemental mindset were less susceptible to than individuals a deliberative (Studies 1, 2). By also using eye-tracking task Study 2,...

10.1007/s11031-020-09847-1 article EN cc-by Motivation and Emotion 2020-07-18

Two potentially costly errors are common in sequential investment decisions: sticking too long to a failing course of action (escalation commitment), and abandoning successful prematurely. Past research has mostly focused on escalation commitment, identified three critical determinants: personal responsibility, preferences for prior decisions, decision framing. We demonstrate studies using an incentivized poker inspired task that these determinants reliably lead makers keep investing even...

10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1025181 article EN cc-by Frontiers in Psychology 2023-01-12

Abstract. We explore motivational processes stemming from bicultural identity goals of being Turkish and German by investigating the effect goal incompleteness versus completeness in two on use multifinal means to self-symbolize German–Turkish cultural goals. Individuals incomplete either or both were more likely than individuals complete engage self-symbolizing via social media activity (Experiment 1) helping 2). Incompleteness regarding had an additive effort elicited distinct patterns...

10.1027/1864-9335/a000486 article EN cc-by Social Psychology 2022-07-01

According to symbolic self completion theory, individuals strive for their aspired-to identity goals by accumulating symbols that indicate the possession of very identity. If lack such symbols, lose them, or fail acquire a state goal incompleteness is triggered motivates goal-directed behavior (i.e., acquiring new symbols). We add this framework an empirical investigation interplay between two goals, addressing question: Will who are incomplete regarding one be more less likely engage in...

10.1037/mot0000245 article EN Motivation Science 2021-10-25

Abstract Background Policy regulations of ethically controversial genetic technologies should, on the one hand, be based ethical principles. On other they should socially acceptable to ensure implementation. In addition, align with theory. Yet date we lack a reliable and valid scale measure relevant judgements in laypeople. We target this lacuna. Methods developed principles elicit lay judgments: Genetic Technologies Questionnaire (GTQ). two pilot studies pre-registered main study, validated...

10.1186/s12910-022-00792-x article EN cc-by BMC Medical Ethics 2022-05-25
Coming Soon ...