Stacy Loeb

ORCID: 0000-0003-3933-9207
Publications
Citations
Views
---
Saved
---
About
Contact & Profiles
Research Areas
  • Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Social Media in Health Education
  • Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
  • Urologic and reproductive health conditions
  • Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
  • Genital Health and Disease
  • Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Urological Disorders and Treatments
  • COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • BRCA gene mutations in cancer
  • Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
  • Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
  • Urinary Tract Infections Management
  • Cancer survivorship and care
  • Renal cell carcinoma treatment
  • Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer

NYU Langone Health
2015-2025

Veterans Health Administration
2016-2025

New York University
2016-2025

VA NY Harbor Healthcare System
2013-2023

National Hospital
2022

Johns Hopkins University
2007-2022

NYU Langone’s Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center
2016-2022

GTx (United States)
2018-2022

Population Council
2019-2021

Manhattan Psychiatric Center
2016-2021

More than 1 million prostate biopsies are performed annually among Medicare beneficiaries. We determined the risk of serious complications requiring hospitalization. hypothesized that with emerging multidrug resistant organisms there may be an increasing infectious complications.In a 5% random sample participants in SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results) regions from 1991 to 2007 we compared 30-day hospitalization rates ICD-9 primary diagnosis codes for admissions between 17,472...

10.1016/j.juro.2011.06.057 article EN The Journal of Urology 2011-09-23

Prostate specific antigen and free prostate have limited specificity to detect clinically significant, curable cancer, leading unnecessary biopsy, detection treatment of some indolent tumors. Specificity significant cancer may be improved by [-2]pro-prostate antigen. We evaluated antigen, using the formula, ([-2]pro-prostate antigen/free × antigen(1/2)) enhance overall high grade cancer.

10.1016/j.juro.2010.12.032 article EN The Journal of Urology 2011-04-10

To assess the predictive ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) velocity (PSAV) and doubling time (PSADT) for biopsy progression adverse pathology at prostatectomy among men with low-risk prostate cancer enrolled on an active-surveillance program.We evaluated 290 who met criteria active surveillance (ie, PSA density < 0.15 ng/mL/cm(3) Gleason score or = 6 no pattern > 4, involving 2 cores cancer, 50% involvement any core by cancer) two more serial measurements after diagnosis from 1994...

10.1200/jco.2009.25.7311 article EN Journal of Clinical Oncology 2010-05-04

The Prostate Health Index (phi) is a new test combining total, free and [-2]proPSA into single score. It was recently approved by the FDA now commercially available in U.S., Europe Australia. We investigate whether phi improves specificity for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer can help reduce over diagnosis.From multicenter prospective trial we identified 658 men age 50 years or older with specific antigen 4 to 10 ng/ml normal digital rectal examination who underwent biopsy....

10.1016/j.juro.2014.10.121 article EN The Journal of Urology 2014-11-17
Veda N. Giri Karen E. Knudsen William Kevin Kelly Heather H. Cheng Kathleen A. Cooney and 87 more Michael S. Cookson William L. Dahut Scott M. Weissman Howard R. Soule Daniel P. Petrylak Adam P. Dicker Saud H. AlDubayan Amanda E. Toland Colin C. Pritchard Curtis A. Pettaway Mary B. Daly James L. Mohler J. Kellogg Parsons Peter R. Carroll Robert Pilarski Amie Blanco Ashley Woodson Alanna Kulchak Rahm Mary-Ellen Taplin Thomas J. Polascik Brian T. Helfand Colette Hyatt Alicia K. Morgans Felix Y. Feng Michael P. Mullane Jacqueline Powers Raoul S. Concepcion Daniel W. Lin Richard C. Wender James Ryan Mark Anthony J. Costello Arthur L. Burnett Oliver Sartor William B. Isaacs Jianfeng Xu Jeffrey N. Weitzel Gerald L. Andriole Himisha Beltran Alberto Briganti Lindsey Byrne Anne Calvaresi Thenappan Chandrasekar David Y.T. Chen Robert B. Den Albert Dobi E. David Crawford James A. Eastham Scott E. Eggener Matthew L. Freedman Marc B. Garnick Patrick T. Gomella Nathan Handley Mark Hurwitz Joseph K. Izes R. Jeffrey Karnes Costas D. Lallas Lucia R. Languino Stacy Loeb Ana María López Kevin R. Loughlin Grace Lu‐Yao S. Bruce Malkowicz Mark Mann Patrick Mille Martin Miner Todd M. Morgan José Moreno Lorelei A. Mucci Ronald E. Myers Sarah M. Nielsen Brock O’Neil Wayne H. Pinover Peter A. Pinto Wendy Poage Ganesh V. Raj Timothy R. Rebbeck Charles J. Ryan Howard M. Sandler Matthew J. Schiewer Emily Scott Brittany M. Szymaniak William Tester Edouard J. Trabulsi Neha Vapiwala Evan Y. Yu Charnita Zeigler‐Johnson Leonard G. Gomella

Germline testing (GT) is a central feature of prostate cancer (PCA) treatment, management, and hereditary assessment. Critical needs include optimized multigene strategies that incorporate evolving genetic data, consistency in GT indications alternate evaluation models address the rising demand for services. A multidisciplinary consensus conference included experts, stakeholders, national organization leaders was convened response to current practice challenges develop implementation...

10.1200/jco.20.00046 article EN Journal of Clinical Oncology 2020-06-09

Purpose It is clinically challenging to integrate genomic-classifier results that report a numeric risk of recurrence into treatment recommendations for localized prostate cancer, which are founded in the framework groups. We aimed develop novel clinical-genomic grouping system can readily be incorporated guidelines cancer. Materials and Methods Two multicenter cohorts (n = 991) were used training validation groups, two additional 5,937) reclassification analyses. Competing risks analysis...

10.1200/jco.2017.74.2940 article EN Journal of Clinical Oncology 2017-11-29

Importance Consumers are increasingly using artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots as a source of information. However, the quality cancer information generated by these has not yet been evaluated validated instruments. Objective To characterize and presence misinformation about skin, lung, breast, colorectal, prostate cancers 4 AI chatbots. Design, Setting, Participants This cross-sectional study assessed chatbots’ text responses to 5 most commonly searched queries related common Search data...

10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.2947 article EN JAMA Oncology 2023-08-24
Silke Gillessen Fabio Turco Ian D. Davis Jason A. Efstathiou Karim Fizazi and 95 more Nicholas D. James Neal D. Shore Eric J. Small Matthew R. Smith Christopher J. Sweeney Bertrand Tombal Thomas Zilli Neeraj Agarwal Emmanuel S. Antonarakis Ana Aparicio Andrew J. Armstrong Diogo Assed Bastos Gerhardt Attard Karol Axcrona Mouna Ayadi Himisha Beltran Anders Bjartell Pierre Blanchard María T. Bourlon Alberto Briganti Muhammad Bulbul Consuelo Buttigliero Orazio Caffo Daniel Castellano Elena Castro Heather H. Cheng Kim N. Caroline S. Clarke Noel W. Clarke Johann S. de Bono Maria De Santis Ignacio Durán Eleni Efstathiou Onyeanunam Ngozi Ekeke Tamer I H El Nahas Louise Emmett Stefano Fanti Omolara Fatiregun Felix Y. Feng Peter C.C. Fong Valérie Fonteyne Nicola Fossati Daniel J. George Martin Gleave Gwénaëlle Gravis Susan Halabi Daniel Heinrich Ken Herrmann Michael S. Hofman Thomas A. Hope Lisa G. Horvath Maha Hussain Barbara Alicja Jereczek‐Fossa Robert J. Jones Anthony M. Joshua R. Kanesvaran Daniel Keizman Raja B. Khauli Gero Kramer Stacy Loeb Brandon A. Mahal Fernando Cotait Maluf Joaquı́n Mateo David Matheson Mika Matikainen Ray McDermott Rana R. McKay Niven Mehra Axel S. Merseburger Alicia K. Morgans Michael J. Morris Hind M’rabti Deborah Mukherji Declan G. Murphy Vedang Murthy Shingai Mutambirwa Paul L. Nguyen William Oh Piet Ost Joe M. O’Sullivan Anwar R. Padhani Chris Parker Darren M.C. Poon Colin C. Pritchard Danny Rabah Dana E. Rathkopf Robert E. Reiter Raphaële Renard‐Penna Charles J. Ryan Fred Saad Juan Pablo Sade Shahneen Sandhu Oliver A. Sartor Edward M. Schaeffer Howard I. Scher

Innovations have improved outcomes in advanced prostate cancer (PC). Nonetheless, we continue to lack high-level evidence on a variety of topics that greatly impact daily practice. The 2024 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) surveyed experts key questions clinical management order supplement evidence-based guidelines. Here present voting results for from APCCC 2024.

10.1016/j.eururo.2024.09.017 article EN cc-by-nc-nd European Urology 2024-10-01
Coming Soon ...