A5090604335- Ethics in Clinical Research
- BRCA gene mutations in cancer
- Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
- Race, Genetics, and Society
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
- Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
- Criminal Law and Policy
- Delphi Technique in Research
- Psychology, Coaching, and Therapy
- Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
- Geographies of human-animal interactions
- Mental Health and Psychiatry
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Pain Management and Placebo Effect
- Global Security and Public Health
- Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
- Neurology and Historical Studies
- Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
- Deception detection and forensic psychology
- Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
- Patient Dignity and Privacy
- Law in Society and Culture
RWTH Aachen University
2019-2022
Analyzing genomic data across populations is central to understanding the role of genetic factors in health and disease. Successful sharing relies on public support, which requires attention whether people around world are willing donate their that then subsequently shared with others for research. However, studies such perceptions geographically limited do not enable comparison. This paper presents results from a very large survey attitudes toward sharing. Data 36,268 individuals 22...
Abstract Background Public trust is central to the collection of genomic and health data sustainability research. To merit trust, those involved in collecting sharing need demonstrate they are trustworthy. However, it unclear what measures most likely this. Methods We analyse ‘Your DNA, Your Say’ online survey public perspectives on including responses from 36,268 individuals across 22 low-, middle- high-income countries, gathered 15 languages. examine how participants perceived relative...
This paper reports findings from Germany-based participants in the "Your DNA, Your Say" study, a collaborative effort among researchers more than 20 countries across world to explore public attitudes, values and opinions towards willingness donate genomic other personal data for use by others. Based on representative sample of German residents (n = 1506) who completed German-language version survey, we found that views genetic exceptionalism were less prevalent arm study English-language...
The aim of this study was to determine how attitudes toward the return genomic research results vary internationally.We analyzed "Your DNA, Your Say" online survey public perspectives on data sharing including responses from 36,268 individuals across 22 low-, middle-, and high-income countries, these were gathered in 15 languages. We participants responded when asked whether (RoR) would motivate their decision donate DNA or health data. examined variation countries compared other with those...
As nation-states make greater efforts to regulate the flow of people on move—refugees, economic migrants, and international travelers alike—advocates DNA profiling technologies claim testing provides a reliable objective way revealing person’s true identity for immigration procedures. This article examines use family reunification in cases Finland, Germany, United States—the first transatlantic analysis such cases—to explore relationship between technology, meaning family, immigration....
This guest editorial opens with a brief overview of the transformations medicine and mental health that can be observed since second half twentieth century. New genetics biotechnologies hold out promise overcoming presumed limitations in field care, is, fact diagnostic procedures psychiatry clinical psychology still largely rely on narratives patients questionnaires, supposedly subjective assessments by physicians psychologists. It is envisioned innovative genetic proteomic tools,...
Zusammenfassung Lügendetektion erlebt an deutschen Gerichten eine Konjunktur, obwohl diese Praxis wissenschaftlich umstritten ist und in der höchstrichterlichen Rechtsprechung kritisch gesehen wird. Wir analysieren die deutsche das juristische Schrifttum zwischen 1954 2017 arbeiten darin doppelte Verschiebung heraus, fortwährende Aushandlung um Legitimität Testverfahren erklärt. Erstens verändert sich Verständnis des Subjekts, welches Gegenstand Testverfahrens ist. Zweitens wandelt Bewertung...
In recent years, progress in the field of lie detection has been linked to technological advances from classic polygraphs neuroscientific brain imaging. our empirical investigation, however, we found different notions that do not comply with popular understanding as innovation. We follow users procedures Germany order discern how they embrace seemingly old technologies and frame them terms novelty improvement. identify two progress: one view polygraph juridical an instrument for procedural...