S. P. Chang

ORCID: 0009-0004-5234-7273
Publications
Citations
Views
---
Saved
---
About
Contact & Profiles
Research Areas
  • Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
  • Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
  • Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research
  • Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
  • Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
  • Scientific Research and Discoveries
  • Computational Physics and Python Applications
  • Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
  • Radio Astronomy Observations and Technology
  • Particle Detector Development and Performance
  • Muon and positron interactions and applications
  • Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers
  • High-Energy Particle Collisions Research
  • Neutrino Physics Research

Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
2021-2023

Institute for Basic Science
2020-2021

We present the first results of Fermilab Muon g-2 Experiment for positive muon magnetic anomaly $a_\mu \equiv (g_\mu-2)/2$. The is determined from precision measurements two angular frequencies. Intensity variation high-energy positrons decays directly encodes difference frequency $\omega_a$ between spin-precession and cyclotron frequencies polarized muons in a storage ring. ring field measured using nuclear resonance probes calibrated terms equivalent proton spin precession...

10.1103/physrevlett.126.141801 article EN cc-by Physical Review Letters 2021-04-07

The Muon g-2 Experiment at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL) has measured the muon anomalous precession frequency $ω_a$ to an uncertainty of 434 parts per billion (ppb), statistical, and 56 ppb, systematic, with data collected in four storage ring configurations during its first physics run 2018. When combined a precision measurement magnetic field experiment's ring, determines anomaly $a_μ({\rm FNAL}) = 116\,592\,040(54) \times 10^{-11}$ (0.46 ppm). This article describes...

10.1103/physrevd.103.072002 article EN cc-by Physical review. D/Physical review. D. 2021-04-07

The Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory has measured the anomalous precession frequency $a^{}_\mu = (g^{}_\mu-2)/2$ of muon to a combined precision 0.46 parts per million with data collected during its first physics run in 2018. This paper documents measurement magnetic field storage ring. is monitored by nuclear resonance systems and calibrated terms equivalent proton spin spherical water sample at 34.7$^\circ$C. weighted distribution resulting $\tilde{\omega}'^{}_p$, denominator ratio...

10.1103/physreva.103.042208 article EN cc-by Physical review. A/Physical review, A 2021-04-07

Based on the notion that local dark-matter field of axions or axionlike particles (ALPs) in our Galaxy induces oscillating couplings to spins nucleons and nuclei (via electric dipole moment latter and/or paramagnetic axion-wind effect), we establish feasibility a new method search for ALPs storage rings. previous work allows us maintain in-plane polarization stored deuteron beam few hundred seconds, perform first proof-of-principle experiment at Cooler Synchrotron (COSY) scan momenta near...

10.1103/physrevx.13.031004 article EN cc-by Physical Review X 2023-07-12

This paper presents the beam dynamics systematic corrections and their uncertainties for Run-1 data set of Fermilab Muon g-2 Experiment. Two to measured muon precession frequency $\omega_a^m$ are associated with well-known effects owing use electrostatic quadrupole (ESQ) vertical focusing in storage ring. An average vertically oriented motional magnetic field is felt by relativistic muons passing transversely through radial electric components created ESQ system. The correction depends on...

10.1103/physrevaccelbeams.24.044002 article EN cc-by Physical Review Accelerators and Beams 2021-04-27

In this paper analytical expressions are derived to describe the spin motion of a particle in magnetic and electric fields presence an axion field causing oscillating dipole moment (EDM). These equations used estimate statistical sensitivities for searches at storage rings. The estimates obtained from analytic compared numerical simulations Chang et al. (Phys Rev D 99(8):083002, 2019). A good agreement is found.

10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7664-9 article EN cc-by The European Physical Journal C 2020-02-01
Coming Soon ...